User:S5lewis13/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Environmental policy
 * Overall the writing and content is really good, there just isn't enough. The article includes nothing about IPCC, kyoto protocol, Paris Agreement and their roles in current environmental policy.
 * Overall the writing and content is really good, there just isn't enough. The article includes nothing about IPCC, kyoto protocol, Paris Agreement and their roles in current environmental policy.

https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement

https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/

https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol

Option 2

 * Politics of climate change
 * It is very thorough and has alot of information. The references seem to be good and most claims have a source. There is a lack of information concerning the IPCC reports and the technological means of combating climate change. There is also a section titled with "tipping point...", but has nothing to do with the climate change definition of "tipping points" which can cause for confusion in readers.
 * https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
 * https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-environ-102511-084654#_i13
 * https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
 * https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-environ-102511-084654#_i13

Option 3

 * Business action on climate change
 * Most of the article is thorough with its points, but to me it seems biased. There is only stuff on the good things that companies are doing to help with climate change and none of the bad. For example it talks all about JP Morgan's "efforts" to help with combating climate change, but says nothing about the billions of dollars the company has spent in the fossil fuel industry. JP morgan's fossil fuel contribution is so significant scientists recently chained themselves to the JP Morgan building in LA in protest.
 * https://www.vox.com/22349601/banks-fossil-fuels-finance-trillions-climate-change
 * https://www.vox.com/22349601/banks-fossil-fuels-finance-trillions-climate-change
 * https://www.vox.com/22349601/banks-fossil-fuels-finance-trillions-climate-change

Option 4

 * Climate change and invasive species
 * I couldn't really find anything wrong other than some sections seem heavily dependent on one source.
 * https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00951.x?casa_token=N1A5pv1keycAAAAA%3A5CMmIsBEU29wNPfj-7tj4q4fP06gglGOGUqbWXpQl50B_HkdI8K16g1oHdSG35cicC-NoVhW15Az
 * https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00951.x?casa_token=N1A5pv1keycAAAAA%3A5CMmIsBEU29wNPfj-7tj4q4fP06gglGOGUqbWXpQl50B_HkdI8K16g1oHdSG35cicC-NoVhW15Az
 * https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00951.x?casa_token=N1A5pv1keycAAAAA%3A5CMmIsBEU29wNPfj-7tj4q4fP06gglGOGUqbWXpQl50B_HkdI8K16g1oHdSG35cicC-NoVhW15Az

Option 5

 * National Invasive Species Act
 * This article is lacking in the sources department. There are a few sections with lots of information, but they have 2 or less sources. Some of the wording is also confusing.
 * https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00952.x?casa_token=ENiFVBm51cIAAAAA%3AyYqnvgqXEaa4fBmiPAyub3PZuLLEVLfw9IJkFo84hFFpG3zkFnMK-A1BApZ43b72IUgLtAdQ9fGp
 * https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00952.x?casa_token=ENiFVBm51cIAAAAA%3AyYqnvgqXEaa4fBmiPAyub3PZuLLEVLfw9IJkFo84hFFpG3zkFnMK-A1BApZ43b72IUgLtAdQ9fGp
 * https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00952.x?casa_token=ENiFVBm51cIAAAAA%3AyYqnvgqXEaa4fBmiPAyub3PZuLLEVLfw9IJkFo84hFFpG3zkFnMK-A1BApZ43b72IUgLtAdQ9fGp