User:SDEVER00/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Murrayonida
 * Overall the article is lacking in content, so it is hard to rate it in other sections. The lead section of the article is decent considering the lack of content, the tone and balance are also good, as well as organization and writing quality from what I can see. However the article doesn't provide much information at all and lacks images and media all together. Of the two sources the article has, the sources seem reliable but aren't up to date. There is no communication going on in the talk section but I am presuming that is because of the absence of content and therefore the lack of ability to critique anything. Other than the fact there is very little content to work with, the article does the best it can to give a description of the Murrayonida sponge order.
 * Klautau, M., Azevedo, F., Cóndor-Luján, B., Rapp, H. T., Collins, A., & Russo, C. A. D. M. (2013). A molecular phylogeny for the order Clathrinida rekindles and refines Haeckel’s taxonomic proposal for calcareous sponges. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 53(3), 447-461.
 * Klautau, M., Lopes, M. V., Tavares, G., & Pérez, T. (2021). Integrative taxonomy of calcareous sponges (Porifera: Calcarea) from Réunion Island, Indian Ocean. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 194 (3), 671–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab014
 * Vacelet, J., Borojevic, R., Boury-Esnault, N., & Manuel, M. (2002). Order Murrayonida Vacelet, 1981. Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow, 1153-1156.
 * Voigt, O., Wülfing, E., & Wörheide, G. (2012). Molecular phylogenetic evaluation of classification and scenarios of character evolution in calcareous sponges (Porifera, class calcarea). PLoS ONE, 7 (3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033417
 * Klautau, M., Lopes, M. V., Tavares, G., & Pérez, T. (2021). Integrative taxonomy of calcareous sponges (Porifera: Calcarea) from Réunion Island, Indian Ocean. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 194 (3), 671–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab014
 * Vacelet, J., Borojevic, R., Boury-Esnault, N., & Manuel, M. (2002). Order Murrayonida Vacelet, 1981. Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow, 1153-1156.
 * Voigt, O., Wülfing, E., & Wörheide, G. (2012). Molecular phylogenetic evaluation of classification and scenarios of character evolution in calcareous sponges (Porifera, class calcarea). PLoS ONE, 7 (3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033417
 * Voigt, O., Wülfing, E., & Wörheide, G. (2012). Molecular phylogenetic evaluation of classification and scenarios of character evolution in calcareous sponges (Porifera, class calcarea). PLoS ONE, 7 (3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033417
 * Voigt, O., Wülfing, E., & Wörheide, G. (2012). Molecular phylogenetic evaluation of classification and scenarios of character evolution in calcareous sponges (Porifera, class calcarea). PLoS ONE, 7 (3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033417

Option 2

 * Pseudogorgia
 * Just like the last article, there isn't much information to work with and the article is lacking in content. From what content is there, the lead section is well written and summarizes the entire article well, but that's only because the lead section is the only section other than the source section. Of the one source that is provided, the information derived from it is out of date considering it's from the 1800s. The article lacks structure but that's only on the account that there is not enough information to create more sections than the lead and sources. The two sentences of the article appear to be well written and relevant, and the links provided also appear to add understanding of the information provided, however there are zero pictures and again not enough content to get an understand of what the Pseudogorgia coral is. Also like the last article there is not a conversation going on in the talk section but again I don't see how anyone could criticize an article that lacks so much content.
 * Eguchi, M. (1973). On some new or little known corals from Japan and Australia. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, 20, 81-87.
 * Kinzie III, R. A. (1974). Experimental infection of aposymbiotic gorgonian polyps with zooxanthellae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 15(3), 335-345.
 * Sherwood, J., Chidgey, S., Crockett, P., Gwyther, D., Ho, P., Stewart, S., ... & Williams, A. (2016). Installation and operational effects of a HVDC submarine cable in a continental shelf setting: Bass Strait, Australia. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 1(4), 337-353.
 * Woolley, S., & Wilson, R. S. (2011). Two new species of Eulepethidae (Polychaeta) from Australian seas. Zootaxa, 2839(1), 47-66.
 * Kinzie III, R. A. (1974). Experimental infection of aposymbiotic gorgonian polyps with zooxanthellae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 15(3), 335-345.
 * Sherwood, J., Chidgey, S., Crockett, P., Gwyther, D., Ho, P., Stewart, S., ... & Williams, A. (2016). Installation and operational effects of a HVDC submarine cable in a continental shelf setting: Bass Strait, Australia. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 1(4), 337-353.
 * Woolley, S., & Wilson, R. S. (2011). Two new species of Eulepethidae (Polychaeta) from Australian seas. Zootaxa, 2839(1), 47-66.
 * Woolley, S., & Wilson, R. S. (2011). Two new species of Eulepethidae (Polychaeta) from Australian seas. Zootaxa, 2839(1), 47-66.
 * Woolley, S., & Wilson, R. S. (2011). Two new species of Eulepethidae (Polychaeta) from Australian seas. Zootaxa, 2839(1), 47-66.

Option 3

 * Nautilus vanuatuensis
 * Currently there is no wikipedia article on this Nautilus species, which is why I would like to write an article about them, so people can more easily learn about the Nautilus vanuatuensis, especially since other Nautilus species are so widely researched.
 * Barord, G. J., Combosch, D. J., Giribet, G., Landman, N., Lemer, S., Veloso, J., & Ward, P. D. (2023). ﻿ Three new species of Nautilus Linnaeus, 1758 (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) from the Coral Sea and South Pacific. ZooKeys, 1143, 51-69
 * Kool, H. H., & Galindo, L. A. (2014). Description and molecular characterization of six new species of Nassarius (Gastropoda, Nassariidae) from the western Pacific Ocean. American Malacological Bulletin, 32(2), 147-164.
 * Barord, G. J., Combosch, D. J., Giribet, G., Landman, N., Lemer, S., Veloso, J., & Ward, P. D. (2023). ﻿ Three new species of Nautilus Linnaeus, 1758 (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) from the Coral Sea and South Pacific. ZooKeys, 1143, 51-69
 * Kool, H. H., & Galindo, L. A. (2014). Description and molecular characterization of six new species of Nassarius (Gastropoda, Nassariidae) from the western Pacific Ocean. American Malacological Bulletin, 32(2), 147-164.
 * Kool, H. H., & Galindo, L. A. (2014). Description and molecular characterization of six new species of Nassarius (Gastropoda, Nassariidae) from the western Pacific Ocean. American Malacological Bulletin, 32(2), 147-164.

=
Like the first two articles, this article is majorly lacking in content. The lead section is the entirety of the article unless you include the sources section, which seems to include up to date reliable articles. The organization is severely lacking but again there isn't too much blame you could put on the writer as there isn't much content to work with. The article does include a photograph and links which in my opinion very much enhance the learning experience an understanding for the reader. As there isn't much information in the article, there isn't much to critique and this is why just like the pervious articles there is no discussion in the talk section and no real way to rate the article. =====

=
Fallas-Madrigal, D., Castelo-Corona, A., Mejías, D., Stephens-Cárdenas, S., Astorga-Arias, J., Molina-Quirós, J. L., & Hernández, S. (2021). Diversity of white spot patterns in the eagle ray Aetobatus laticeps (Myliobatiformes: Aetobatidae) in the north Pacific coast of Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical, 69, 267-276. =====

=
González‐Ramos, M. S., Santos‐Moreno, A., Rosas‐Alquicira, E. F., & Fuentes‐Mascorro, G. (2017). Validation of photo‐identification as a mark–recapture method in the spotted eagle ray Aetobatus narinari. Journal of Fish Biology, 90(3), 1021-1030. =====

=
Ladino Archila, F., Martínez-Mondragón, S. B., Duarte-Fajardo, M. A., Vélez, N., & Bessudo Lion, S. (2021). Monitoring of the status of eleven bony and cartilaginous fish populations in the Malpelo Sanctuary of Fauna and Flora, Colombian Pacific. Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras-INVEMAR, 50(1), 105-120. =====

=
Sales, J. B. L., de Oliveira, C. N., dos Santos, W. C. R., Rotundo, M. M., Ferreira, Y., Ready, J., ... & da Silva Rodrigues-Filho, L. F. (2019). Phylogeography of eagle rays of the genus Aetobatus: Aetobatus narinari is restricted to the continental western Atlantic Ocean. Hydrobiologia, 836, 169-183. =====