User:SGGH/Archive13

Cash flow / provisioning interface
Hi SGGH. Re the AfD for Cash flow / provisioning interface, is it better form for me to go ahead and vote for speedy deletion on my article, finish the article off-line and then resubmit it later? I still have to finish more of the article, the supportive research, et al., and I'm prbly a three/four weeks out. Journeyman105 (talk) 01:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Wrightsoft
Hi SGGH, I have no idea if I should be contacting you with regard to a AfD for Wrightsoft. As you were the original administrator to give my article AfD (on June 5th), I was wondering - one way or another - when a decision might be reached. Any help you can provide would be most grateful. BTW, had I paid closer attention to the rules, I would never have placed the article online. I don't blame you for the AfD, but really was inquiring for a final decision as I feel the debate has lost steam and gotten tangled in the Dead Letter List at Wikipedia. Thanks, JLevangie02420(talk)

Article Breast Cancer Care
Hi. In 2007, you deleted article Breast Cancer Care. I'm currently thinking about to recreate it. Any comments? Thanks. Prowikipedians (talk) 15:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh. Ok. I see. I'll add the article as soon as possible, as soon as I finish some of the articles I'm currently working on. Prowikipedians (talk) 04:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Ignorance (Folk/Punk Band)
you deleted my article because it wasn't notable, i don't know why it wasn't and also i don't know i what i can do to make it notable. i think that the article was important was about a folk band from south america, and that's special, in wikipedia there're a lot of bands articles i don't know why you refuse to publish the article of this band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xignominiax (talk • contribs) 15:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:Message on Satyr's talk page
In regards to this comment, Satyr is on a WikiBreak right now so I don't think he'll respond any time soon. His bot received several messages about mix-ups and it was turned off while Satyr is away, so it won't be making any more errors like the one you mentioned. Cheers.  APK  yada yada  09:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay dokes, thanks. SGGH speak! 12:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Picture peer review/Diving Emperor Penguins
Would love to help. This definetly looks like a job for the selection tool. Then it just needs curves or a levels adjustment. Still need Photoshop, though! Can work the trial if I download it today. MSN broken again? Red Gown (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually just got rid of it because I misread and realised what an idiot I was. :p

Red Gown (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Sowwwwie, but look, I fixed it! Red Gown (talk) 11:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Coaching
Hello SGGH

I hope you dont mind me asking, but would you be interested in admin coaching me? I'd be really grateful =]. Many thanks, yours. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 14:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 14:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandals for blocking
Block these vandals please:

Here and User talk:Scoobydoo487, Both have had at least three of four warnings and some of their vandalsim has gone undetected. Things would be a lot easier if I had admin tools. It would save me pestering admins all the time. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 21:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Contentious username
User:AspergersGamer gave an explanation for his/her name, and it seems ok to me. Since there doesn't seem to have been any follow-up since then, would it ok for me to remove the Category:Wikipedian usernames editors have expressed concern over from it now? I am unsure what the proper etiquette in this situation would be. Thanks! -kotra (talk) 02:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi SGGH
I have started an article about Harry Peckham who appears to have connections with early cricket and the LBW rule. Looking around for a wikiexpert I found you. Can you assist? Did he play? Thx anyway Victuallers (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC) Thx - he does seem an odd one - I have also looked at Charles Bennet, 4th Earl of Tankerville - who seems to be much better documented. Victuallers (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Cheers - good luck with the revision. Victuallers (talk) 20:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: .sport
.sport has re-appeared. I've tagged it for AfD. As the admin who speedy-deleted it at the weekend, I thought you might have an interest in this. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your suggestion
Dear SGGH, I noted what you had written in my Talk page. I do not log in other than on weekends and have been doing this from outside of my Wiki account. I understand an Admin's job besides blocking and warning is also to see if the content is right (besides where it is wrong). You had pointed out where I was gong overboard. Please, please, please visit the Vivian Richards page now. I removed the two phrases you mentioned. As a Cricket follower you need no intro to the man. In any case, please let me know if there is any rhetoric or 'fan-site' like statements made there and please intimate me of the same.

While you have been telling me all this and not to 'edit-war', please have a look at the Sachin Tendulkar page and you would see the falsities and bias there. 100% of my statements (now that I have removed those additional ones) are factual, furthermore, I have mentioned the people whose opinions I have quoted, which I believe is correct. Also, I have cited the best sources on the Net like Cricinfo, and top-class international newspapers like Telegraph etc as my citations. Unlike many other pages that 'adhere to Wiki guidelines here'. Biased people like Blungyen are wont to prevent me from modifying accordingly and he has removed statements supported by citations and the citations from my last edit, for what? For the citations being from the best sources? Please have a look and judge for yourself rather than coming after me. I am assuming you are not the Blungyen kind ie, and hope am right in doing so in the first place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.216.36 (talk) 14:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot
Thanks SGGH, I felt right about you. Now people like Blungyen shall think twice about undoing Edits in the page. FYI, that man had removed references from Cricinfo, Rediff, Telegraph, BBC etc. I hope you realize what kind of bias he has.

However I disagree with your having removed the third and fourth ratings from the intro. Please revert them. The 49 cricketers I mentioned that rated Richards at 3 overall after Bradman and Sobers and at 2 among bats after the Don had legends like Sunil Gavaskar, Wasim Akram, Michael Holding, Richard Hadlee, Ian Botham, Ian Chappell etc, and this was on behalf of ESPN as the page says at. The fourth citation, in my opinion was also correct, as it was from amazon.com and there was a poll earlier this decade where Ian Botham and Shane Warne voted Richards as the best of the 'last 30 years'. Warne has said at other places that Richards was the best bat he ever saw, though Tendulkar and Lara are the best he bowled to (he never bowled to Richards). Thanks again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.216.36 (talk) 16:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

June 11
Hi SGGH, thanks for your help on the Richards page. Regarding your last message on my Talk page, I did not really do anything there after you worked on it yesterday. Except of course revert the changes that the trouble-maker Blunguen made there regarding helmets. I don't understand what your point is about not keeping it clean. I understand what you had written in your earlier message regarding how to format entries and edits in Wiki. But I never really did anything on that page after you were there yesterday. Also I have an account as Anup Ramakrishnan but usually cannot log in other than on weekends.

As for Richards, I do immensely admire him, but cannot call him my idol. In fact he was before my time, I was in my early teens when I really started following the game in the early 90s. (As a child, I was following the game of tennis more and Boris Becker was my childhood hero.)

My opinions of Richards, Bradman, Sobers, Hammond, Gavaskar, Imran etc are based largely on what I have read of them, besides watching their videos. Despite being an Indian, I do not share this enthusiasm about Tendulkar who is 70% hype. I too rate Ponting highly and about on par with Lara and Tendulkar. I have always had the feeling that the 1990s batsmen had it easier than the pre-1990 ones due to relatively good batting tracks, lots of protective gear, tons of restrictions on bowlers like one-bouncer and two-bouncers per over, and I would add inferior fast bowlers, lesser in pace and in quality, though that was the greatest era of spin with Warne, Murali, Kumble, Saqlain etc. And this post-2000 decade has completed what was begun around 1990 with it being totally batsman-friendly, leading in turn to near-total demise of fast bowlers. In order to prove themselves, bats from this decade have to do better than those from the 1990s who in turn would have had to do more than those from pre-1990.

Finally my rating on my knowledge of batsmen in cricketing history would be - Bradman, Richards, Sobers, Hammond, Hobbs, Kanhai, Gavaskar, Chappell, Barry Richards, Graeme Pollock for the top 10. Well thats how I see it, and am not alone. I understand it is best for Wikipedia to have unbiased people for Admins. Well there is at least one who is not, thanks to you he did not revert changes made on that page. With regards 68.45.216.36 (talk) 15:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Priory of Sion Peer Review
Hello. You would be interested in participating in the peer review of the Priory of Sion article? --Loremaster (talk) 11:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC) ✅ SGGH speak! 11:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Ron Hamence
I've reviewed Ron Hamence. There's not much to do before I probably pass it. However, for some reason the review hasn't appeared on the talk page. But it's still got the tranclusion at Talk:Ron Hamence/GA1. Peanut4 (talk) 14:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Viet articles

 * Anything about both the First and Second IndoChina Wars interests me. I worked with Roger Davis on Operation Camargue. SGGH speak! 19:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you want any sources that I can plunder for you? Electronic books?  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 03:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * We can get a bit of Vietnam military and history FA factory. I have stacks of papers and what not and I can get books for you from here if you need them in electronic form.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 04:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

copyedit request
Hey, noticed your membership with the Copyediting Department. Would you mind doing a prose copyedit of Operation Tractable for me? It just passed its GA and there are a few prose issues that need to be fixed before going for A-Class later this month. Cam (Chat) 02:38, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Certainly will SGGH speak! 11:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ what I can SGGH speak! 12:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Ashley Giles
You got Ashley Giles' autograph? Isn't it great when you get the autograph of someone famous whose abilities you admire? Hey, I didn't tell you about my last adventure on Memorial Day did I? Check it out here: Press Releases. Tony the Marine (talk) 15:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Marriage
Congratulations! Best wishes. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 17:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You got married and you didn't even invite me to the wedding (smile)? Congrats and welcome to the club, sucker! (smile). All kidding aside, I wish you and your woman all of the happiness in the world. You are one of the good guys here. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Not actually married yet, just a term of closeness, but still thank you very much for your best wishes, I shall marry her someday! SGGH speak! 21:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Be careful. I will hold you to that. :) Red Gown (talk) 02:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, I see. That explains why I wasn't invited to the wedding (smile). Tony the Marine (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Happy First Day of Summer!
Happy First Day of Summer! Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Summer 2008!

If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Winter not Summer then I wish you a Happy First Day of Winter 2008!

Give this greeting to others by adding   on their Talk Page.

MSUG
Hi SGGH. asked me if I knew any people who were interested in VN topics to look at a certain article, so here I am. Peer_review/Michigan_State_University_Group/archive1 is about a program of technical assistance to Ngo Dinh Diem. Best regards.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 03:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Input please...
...here. I'd really appreciate it. --Dweller (talk) 12:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

PR request
You said anything and everything under the "history" category? I was unable to find a correct category for 2008 Sichuan earthquake, but could you please leave a peer review for it here? Thanks. --haha169 (talk) 00:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Genesee County, New York Sheriff's Office
I'm trying to save this from deletion. Can you assess it? Bearian (talk) 22:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Geoffrey Boycott
Sandy! I haven't seen you for ages! (I guess I haven't written an FA for ages) my next hopeful is above (been waiting about a month for a damn picture) got any thoughts on it, when you have a spare minute? SGGH speak! 21:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)


 * It's not quite ready for FAC; I suggest the following approach (in this order):


 * 1) Correct the issues I left in edit summary.
 * 2) Ask User:Dweller and User:The Rambling Man to have a look.
 * 3) Ask User:GrahamColm to go through to check jargon after the Cricket guys (above) have been through.
 * 4) Ask User:Epbr123 to do a final MoS check before approaching FAC (there are many MoS errors).

Good luck! Sandy Georgia (Talk) 20:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

PR experiment
Dear SGGH, I'm writing in hopes of enlisting your aid in a four-month experiment at Peer Review (PR). The success of the experiment will depend on finding at least 10 editors willing to review at least one article a week through the end of October 2008. The experiment will employ a streamlined review process designed to insure that every nominator who seeks a review gets one and that reviewers do not waste time doing long reviews for nominators who do not respond to an initial short review.

The way it works is this: (1) Choose any article at Peer Review that lacks a review. Peer reviews by date, especially the backlog list, is still a good place to find such articles. (2) Provide a short partial review based on your initial observations and wait to see if the nominator responds. Examples of short reviews can be found at Peer review/Foreign relations of India/archive1 and Peer review/Ed Stelmach/archive1. (3) If the nominator does not respond, the review is done. (4) If the nominator responds, continue the review as you see fit.

The experiment will require no noticeable administration. However, if you plan to participate, it would be helpful if you posted a brief note to Wikipedia talk:Peer review to that effect. At the end of October, we can see how the experiment turned out and whether this process or some modification of it could sustain Peer Review permanently with minimal backlogs. If you can help, that would be great. If not, that's perfectly OK. We are all tremendously busy with a lot of different projects.

I have chosen to write to you in part because you've done peer reviews from the backlog during the past four months. Please forgive the form-letter nature of this note, which is more efficient than a personal note. With respect and thanks for your hard work on many projects, Finetooth (talk) 04:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Russian-Circassian War
As a question/request... I recently noticed that the Russian-Circassian War FA will be on the Main Page on July 6, and you seem to be the major contributor. A user added some "dubious" tags to it back in March, which are still sitting on the article currently, mostly dealing with some murky dates. I'm not familiar with the issue myself, but do you know if these tags have any merit?

I posted this request to the Military History Wikiproject, too.

Regardless, it's an interesting article about a conflict I was only vaguely familiar with, so nice job. SnowFire (talk) 21:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:17, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

List of English Twenty20 International cricketers
Hi SGGH. Could you revisit List of English Twenty20 International cricketers when you get the chance, and then comment at Featured list removal candidates/List of English Twenty20 International cricketers. Do you feel it is up to current FL standards? I'm looking at closing it one way or the other ASAP. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyedit
The A-class article Roman-Persian Wars undergoes a GA review and is critized for its language. It would be great help if you could improve this. Thank you Wandalstouring (talk) 09:20, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Silly Idea
Hello sir I am back on wiki after a month long enforced wikibreak I hate being away from wiki in mean time I have generated few wired and silly Ideas I want to share them with you

If we do all this then we will be Law enforcement portal in true sense (Ignore my spieling mistakes and grammatical mistake because I am using Firefox for first time in IE 7 google use to check my spieling )  Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 03:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Since we are members of Law enforcement on wiki our project should be in-charge maintaining law and order on wikipedia i.e we must have authority to block vandals
 * ''there is already a process to do this with the admin system, otherwise the project would become a kind of unretrained vigilante system, remember the project is about law enforcement, it isn't law enforcement itself (there is a disclaimer at the bottom of the project page) and there is a strong concensus on wikipedia to avoid a "wiki-police"
 * We must set up a complaint and grievance cell where a user can complaint about users who are biting them (Like a real Police station :P )
 * There is dispute resolution, third opinion and the admin incident noticeboard which do this already for the whole of wikipedia, but users are free to contact Necrocept (sp?) and myself on the project who are both admins and can deal with things if necessary)
 * then we should have a Talk page (Equivalent to real life court) where both the party's will put their side Project coordinators will be the judge
 * dispute resolution and third opinion do this already
 * Hi there, sorry for my late reply, unfortunately there are a few issues with the ideas you propose. I have listed them above. You might be more suited airing your ideas at the official areas I mention above :) SGGH speak! 20:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Mumbai police
Hello sir I have got more information about mumbai police so now I can expant this article But problem is that I cant give reference because I have collected this information directly from police station what should I do ? Be bold and expand this article or just wait and watch ? thank you sir  Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 05:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * by the way i have copied your talk page style sir;)  Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 05:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No need to call me sir :) but you can either try and put it on and see what concensus says after, or try to verify the information through a better source now that you know what it is. Apologies for the late reply, computer trouble. SGGH speak! 20:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Robin-williams-uso07-1.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Robin-williams-uso07-1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 06:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Admin Coaching
Hi SGGH, I hope your wikibreak/honeymoon is going well (I saw that you changed the dedication on the rose and Red Gown changed her page as well) and anyways congrats and all the best mate :). Anyways, I was wondering if you would consider being my admin coach?  I have been actively looking for an admin coach for a while now and everyone that I have talked to is either busy or already has too many students and I was wondering if you would consider becoming my admin coach.  Also please do not feel compelled to accept my requst if you don't want to be my admin coach please do not hesitate to say no, I don't want to force you into anything that you don't want to do.  Anyways, thanks in advance and All the Best, --Mifter (talk) 21:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Request for massive favour on India Hose, a current FAC
Hello SGGH, I was wondering if I could ask you for a massIve favour and help copyedit India House. This artilce is currently listed for FAC. A reviewer in the FAC mentioned quite strongly that the text is not upto the mark. I thought it would help a lot if somebody had a look and suggested any improvement, since it has already been copyedited once by another editor and once byself. Please understand that I am neither looking for your support in the FAC, nor am I asking you to comment on wether it deserves or not to be FA, since I realise this would be canvassing. Nontheless, any comments on improving the article would be extremely welcome. rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 01:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * i'm afraid that with sporadic internet access at the moment I may not be able to help until after the FAC is over. SGGH speak! 20:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Late Roman Army
Late Roman army is currently nominated for A-class. Can you please comment on prose in this review. Thanks Wandalstouring (talk) 13:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Mozambican War of Independence
Hi SGGH, I'm a new Wikipedian and just read your fine FA on the Mozambican War of Independence. I'm writing something related (biographies of FRELIMO leaders (see Uria Simango) and could really do with some peer review, so if you have time- all comments gratefully accepted (but can quite understand if you are otherwise engaged at present!!)

I wanted to suggest a couple of revisions to your FA, but don't want to tinker with your article unless you agree...???

1) In the section "Rise of Frelimo", there should be no reference to RENAMO. RENAMO did not exist then; it started after FRELIMO won the war against the Portuguese. RENAMO fought the Mozambican Civil War which started after Mozambique's independence. In sum: after 1964 Lyndon B Johnson withdrew support from FRELIMO. But here the references are about Reagan's refusal in the 1980s to support RENAMO- 20 years later (btw RENAMO were a bit like the Contras in Nicaragua, anticommunist guerillas, but were so brutal even the Reagan administration gave them a wide berth). Frelimo vs the Portuguese (1962-1974) and (RENAMO vs Frelimo 1977-1994) are different wars and should not be conflated? Your first version (of March 10 2007) was correct, so I suggest a reversion?

2) Last section:"The Portuguese-sponsored elections in Mozambique only spurred ..." But there were no national elections in Mozambique in 1974 at all (see my article Uria Simango: they happened only in 1994; even Portugal had its first free elections only in 1975). Frelimo's policy was for a one-party Marxist state and the Lusaka Accord signed with the Portuguese on 8 Sept 1974 handed over sole power on that basis.

I suggest refs to elections be deleted? Or clarified?

3) Under "Continuing war": "Aldeamentos: agua para todos" (Resettlement villages: water for everyone) was a commonly seen message in the rural areas, as FRELIMO set up safer villages..." In fact the aldeamentos were a (very unpopular) Portuguese (not Frelimo) military strategy to drain the countryside of the people on whom Frelimo relied. ie to "drain the sea in which the fish (guerrillas) swam" by evacuating their civilian support. The offer of water was an inducement by the Portuguese to mitigate the forced relocation of the population. Your references confirm this. It is easy to rephrase.

I'd like to link to my article once it has passed some quality control. Uria Simango actually succeeded Mondlane in the leadership but was ousted and later executed by Samora Machel. Thanks, User:zambez1a 21:00 July 20 2008. —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)
The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

copyedit request
Hey, SGGH, I've got 2nd Canadian Infantry Division on the verge of finishing its GAN, and it is in need of a good copyedit before undergoing an ACR this month. Would you happen to have time to do so for me? Regards, Cam (Chat) 23:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, saw the wikibreak marker. Cam (Chat) 23:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)
The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)