User:SHRansom/be bold

Being bold is important on Wikipedia. Being bold is important on Wikipedia.

Article Evaluation
Relational Dialectics - article I am reviewing.

Notes: Link to Barbara Montgomery in first paragraph does not connect to an existing page.

Yin and yang reference doesn't seem pertinent.

The link to the definition of model seems unnecessary to the article.

The link to the definition of heterosexual also seems unnecessary.

The examples of relationships left out work relationships.

Social media is left out despite its impact on daily life.

Theory applications section doesn't include applications that are more common, everyday occurrences.

There is a lot of information in the article, and the majority of it can be tied in some way to relational dialectics/communication. However, some of those ties are very weak. The overall tone of the article doesn't seem biased to any side. I have had trouble checking the reference links as Wikipedia continues to time out.

There are a lot of suggestions on the Talk page that would make the article clearer to read and understand.

Suggested adding information on social media and relational dialectics, provided source:

Baxter, L. A., & Widenmann, S. (1993). Revealing and Not Revealing the Status of Romantic Relationships to Social Networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407593103002