User:SJBrennan/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Gene Knockout

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Upon opening the article, I noticed the introduction section contained no citations. I felt under the "Types" section, there needed to be more than one type of knockout explained. I also think the "Use" section could use more information

Evaluate the article
This article is fairly shallow and could use more information and deeper explanation in each of its current sections. The lead paragraph contains no citations. This paragraph could benefit from more information from a variety of new sources, such as an introductory element for each of the subsections that will be discussed further in the article. The "Methods" section gives adequate information for each heading in a summarized format. The “Types” section contains one heading. This section could benefit from more headings and information from a variety of sources. The material in this section is very minimal. The “Use” gives a short description of one use of gene knockouts and uses one source. The text is lacking from a more in-depth explanation and could be split up into multiple headings with uses of gene knockouts.. Overall, this article needs to be updated with more current sources and stimulated with more information in each section. The "Use" section could be changed to “applications”.