User:SKXu/Gestational choriocarcinoma/Mtayag Peer Review


 * 1) The lead briefly summarizes the article, where it includes both treatment and prognosis. The introductory sentence is worded well and describes the topic of the article, however there are some words like "trophoblast" that needs to be defined or explained in lay language for viewers. The lead include a description of some of the sections. The contents added are relevant to the article and talks mainly about the topic. Each paragraph is relevant to the section as well. I recommend adding a "signs and symptoms" section, as this would add more information regarding the article. The article has a lot of information and is neutral. Most of the references are within the past 10 years, but some are dated back to 2003. I appreciate the table and graphs that are added to explain the topics. I think that overall, the paragraphs are relevant to the topic, there are some words that would require more explanation to make it easier for viewers to understand.
 * 2) I believe that the group achieved their overall goals for improvement. There are just some things that can be added. This includes defining more terms that may be hard for some viewers to understand. Adding a few more sections (if relevant to the topic) like "signs and symptoms" and/or "risk factors". Otherwise, I believe that the information within the article are neutral and important to fully understand the topic.
 * 3) (B) The contents of the article are well cited. The sites are freely available and are from secondary sources. Most of the articles cited are within the past 10 years, but there are some that goes beyond that. Most are also from PubMed and are verifiable.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)