User:SLSCROWLEYHOUSETRUSTEE/sandbox

STERNSLAW: STERNSLAW IS IN DIRECT RESPONSE TO AND REFUTATION OF, GAVIN'S LAW  (HYPERLINK IN WIKIPEDIA)

With Godwin's Law (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law) the moment a reference is made to anything that involves, fascism, nazism, or similarity to and of Hitler, or NAZI's the subject matter is deemed to be closed, that the person speaking, is basically minimized and denigrated, and may be told to "stop talking" and then relegated and treated as if "a second-class person" (reference to Goodridge v Department of Public Health) for having the audacity to think that their life experience(s), and those that are causing their life experience(s), are related to, or similar to, FASCISM or NAZISM, that those person's, entities, state institutions, are similar to fascists and nazi's, or any other term that could describe HOW the person feels that they have been treated. With Gavin's Law, it is a means to quash the subject matter, to deny "Freedom of Speech" within a therapy session. It guarantees that the person using such a term, "Gavin's Law" had decided for themselves that the person who is engaging in the subject matter, is not entitled to engage in the analogy because it is impossible to draw an analogy of similarity between the person's life event or experiences, to those that engaged in tactics, policies, and programs during NAZI Germany. One must remember that even in America, a woman's right to vote did not occur until 1919 (http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=63). It was illegal for a woman to vote, and, in fact, Susan B. Anthony. ( http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/anthony/sbaaccount.html) arrested for voting in a Presidential election. Prior to 1863, African Americans were slaves in America (http://www.civilwar.org/education/in4/emancipation-procla.html?gclid=CMHc8eaR1ssCFUYehgodxYEKjQ?referrer=http://www.google.com/aclk?sa=l&ai=CTTnwCDLyVvKNE4S3hATN74HgDZK3ycMH4pX8xLQC8s-xugQIABABILP4_hhgyc75iISk1BCgAciRpPUDyAEBqgQpT9A2J541zrwhksOoO8yDGGtIrSlnOCNjWBXjqRpQlJjdNJlEkScZyG7YBgSAB6Du2wqQBwOoB6a-G9gHAQ&sig=AOD64_2AsCh_xVo0UYaCbNVbUJggb9sGHw&clui=0&rct=j&q=emancipation%20proclamation&ved=0ahUKEwi0irvfkdbLAhXBMSYKHY3mCsIQ0QwIGg&adurl=http://www.civilwar.org/education/in4/emancipation-procla.html) In South Africa, Apartheid was legal (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid). In Nazi Germany, Jews were forced to wear "Stars of David" as was enacted by Law (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_badge). Law is not necessarily moral, or righteous, it is determined by the political power, or political structure, in control, over a society. Law (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law) may be enacted, but it may also be unconstitutional (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutionality). In America, Rosa Parks (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosa_Parks) violated the law by sitting in a bus at the front of the bus when the law designated blacks were to sit in the back of the bus. There were other Jim Crow (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Crow_laws) laws of America until 1965.

The refutation of a person to deny that their are similarities between, for an example, the actions of the state, and their employees, whom may have engaged in unscrupulous behaviors of stealing children, as an example by the Department of Social Services, or Department of Children and Families agencies, that use their police powers, and, sometimes, with the support of the police agency themselves, to falsely accuse a parent before their children, then forcibly remove the parent's child, without due process (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_process) of law, the children are also deemed property (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property) in the United States, (http://www.debate.org/opinions/are-children-the-property-of-their-parents) to then place the children in a Foster Care System(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foster_care)in order to derive a future income from the trafficking of the children, under 45 CFR 302.55 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/302.55) There are hundreds if not thousands of cases every year of a foster care system in the United States that is destructive to the family unit, violating the civil rights of both parent and child, of a Rico (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act) enterprise, full of corruption to derive an income from trafficking in children. In one recent case, a Judge was sentenced to Federal Prison for using "Kids for Cash" (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_for_cash_scandal) as a means to fund a juvenile prison system. One child committed suicide, but dozens of children and families were destroyed in the process.

STERN'S LAW refutes GODWIN'S LAW. The quintessential question is NOT to STOP the speaker from speaking, but to ask, WHY the speaker is believing, from life experience, or, from events, or from any number of factors, of the issue they are having as its related to FASCISM, or NAZISM like behavior by the entity, or person that they are in conflict with. In fact, Within the definition of Godwin's law:

We know certain truths to be self-evident. We know, that the Government of the United States, built a United States Naval Base in the Coronado California, as the shape of a NAZI SWASTIKA. We know, that the doctrine known as "Best Interest" doctrine, was first created by the Germans during its NAZI era in the late 1930's and that this doctrine was preceded by the "Tender Years Doctrine" that was used throughout the United States.

We know that there are other institutions of America that have other symbolism of NAZI Germany, including, but not limited to, floor tiles in one State building in Massachusetts, and other state buildings have been known to have the actual swastika in it.

We know that there are commercials that have shown NAZI IRON CROSS within the design of a particular jewelry item sold by a major retailer in the United States.

We know that a television show, Brad Meltzer's History, or something like that (edit), showed a NAZI SWASTIKA in its pages through promotion of its television show.

We know that the NAZI SWASTIKA was once used as a symbol long before the Germans and the NAZI party defiled it for their own symbolism. The previous use of the symbol is not outweighed by the horrific events that occurred by the use of the symbol by NAZI Germany.

The issue is not whether or not FASCISM and NAZISM exists, we know that Neo-Nazi's exist and that there are "hate crime" targeted against people because of one's religious, ethnic and belief systems. We know that there is Anti-Semitism in the world. We know that there are other belief systems that attack all other belief systems, such as Islam under ISIS, and, have sought to use their MUSLIM faith as a means to destroy CHRISTIANS.

The question is WHY is it being taught to hate one race and religion and people over another? Why is there hate?

Why is it acceptable to tell someone to stop speaking "Gavin's Law" as when the subject turns to the subject of similarity or analogy between a person's particular situation and Fascism, or describing entities and persons's as NAZI's? Why should someone be denied the right to speak because of "Gavin's Law" that suggests the subject matter is closed for mentioning the similarity altogether? Gavin's Law is, in essence, a refutation of "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" and the therapeutic community using the term "GAVIN's LAW" as a means to change the subject matter, or, to deny the person from describing their feelings, is in essence, failing to achieve the purpose for which they are engaging in therapy, the question is WHY does that person believe that the actions of another state entity, or, of another person, in particular, is acting like a NAZI? The reason for therapy is not to stop someone from talking, but, to understand and grasp the concept of why the person feels the way that they do.

There was once a description of various forms of government and the use of cows as an analogy. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_have_two_cows) With Gavin's Law, the use of the animal, cow, could be offensive to the people of India, whom hold the cow sacred, does the use of the cow as a metaphor and how government treats its people such that the analogy of Politics and two cows be forever be not referenced, because, in essence, that is what Gavin's Law does, stops the subject matter from being spoken about. It should be refuted, just like that of discrimination itself..