User:SQ12/Co-cultural communication theory/Victoria.reeves1997 Peer Review

General info
User:SQ12
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:SQ12/Co-cultural communication theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Co-cultural communication theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
The information added to the Co-cultural communication theory was interesting. The original article has no mention of specific co cultures to give the reader as an example, therefore giving the article some explanation to how a co-culture will occur is a good idea. Since the article doesn't focus on the theory's impact past the year 2004, it's good to update the information fitting with a more recent version of how the theory is used. It is good that there is a simple explanation to how a co-culture occurs (assimilation, separation, accommodation) so that those who are reading about the theory for the first time can understand it. The example of feminist stand point theory or FST being used to show the use of a co culture theory is very effective as the original article explains only the history of the theory but not how it is used. It's also good that assumptions are mentioned in accordance to Co-cultural communication theory, since they aren't mentioned in the original article it's good to make note of them because that is a common issue when researching theories.

The tone of the article so far sounds very professional, there are some grammatical errors but those can be easily fixed. The sections are a bit short and the works cited need to be linked within the article. The sections discussing the assumptions can be extended a bit, maybe give an example to help the reader understand how an inaccurate assumption can effect the research of the theory. So far the article is written well and professional, just some of the information can be extended upon in the final draft.