User:SRMcGarvey/1721 Boston smallpox outbreak

Article Evaluation Questions:

Everything seems relevant except a portion talking about Judge Sewell. He didn't seem to impact this epidemic in any way. Seems neutrally biased I think its all fair Web links work, would have to check books later Seems fine I wondered what the economic impacts of this epidemic was. I also wondered what were precautions the city took.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

SRMcGarvey (talk) 16:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)