User:SRMiranda18/sandbox

Article Evaluation -- Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * some grammar and punctuation errors
 * equal information is not given about all of the victims
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * it is pretty neutral
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * there is not equal representation of the victims, and seems to depend mainly on the theory of mental distress
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * yes
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * yes, range of news sources, some are a little biased due to the slant of the news source
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * information about all victims, updates likely to come
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * a lot of conversation about the type of weapon used and other specific
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * not rated
 * part of lots of projects
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * depend mainly on the theory of mental distress, don't address violence of culture or masculinity
 * not rated
 * part of lots of projects
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * depend mainly on the theory of mental distress, don't address violence of culture or masculinity
 * depend mainly on the theory of mental distress, don't address violence of culture or masculinity

!Women Art Revolution

 * https://exhibits.stanford.edu/women-art-revolution *talk about the archive
 * add cast section
 * exhibitions, installations, and things it started
 * artist, curator, and critic interviews https://exhibits.stanford.edu/women-art-revolution/feature/artist-curator-critic-interviews
 * *There is a note that the information may have been copy and pasted, in violation of wikipedia
 * can add credits, add information about the writer/director/producer
 * Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page.
 * needs more information, citations and verification
 * Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.
 * imdb

Peer Review:
1) What have you done to revise/add on to your Wikipedia article? If there's anything you still have left to do, what is it?

I have changed the synopsis so that it does not violate copyrights and I have added onto the synopsis to reflect what the film covers. I added information to the "Release" section and "Digital Archives." I added a "Reception" section. I still need to change the intro sentence.

2) What's going well? What are you most proud of so far?

I am proud of my interviewee chart and the links it contains.

3) What specific places in the article do you want feedback on from your peers?

Citing my "reception" sources from the TCU Library

Synopsis
!Women Art Revolution is a documentary film, created by Lynn Hershman Leeson, to examine the under-recognized world of feminist art. Through interviews, documentary footage, and artworks, the film tracks the trajectory of feminist art. It begins at the start of the 1960s with antiwar and civil rights protests, it follows developments in feminist art through the 1970s.

Lynn Hershman Lesson interviewed artists, curators, critics, and historians for over 4 decades about their individual and group efforts to help women succeed in the art world and society by helping them overcome obstacles. There were over 40 individuals interviewed for the project. These interviews are done in a variety of places over time. The interviewees talk about their experiences in the art world facing obstacles because of their gender. Many of the artists discuss the works they made as a result.The movie begins with a scene at the Whitney Museum of American Art, where Hershman asks people to name 3 women artists, very few can name more than Frida Khalo. Hershman calls the film the, "remains of an insistent history that refuses to wait any longer to be told." She says the events of the day led her to feel an, "urgency to capture that moment" and shoot whenever, wherever with a borrowed camera.

The film gets its name from the Women Artists in Revolution (WAR), which formed in the 1960's as a coalition to raise awareness about the unique obstacles faced by female artists. Many of the issues started at a fundamental level, Rachel Rosenthal states in the movie, with the women artists not getting recognition in the study of art history and books. The interviewees all talk about how male-dominated the art world was, sharing their personal stories. The work these feminist artists were creating at the time were very different from works shown or talked about at the time.

The film overlays historical events with feminist art events, which were somewhat spurred on by these political events such as the Vietnam War, Black Panthers, Civil Rights Movement, Women's Liberation, and Free Speech Movement. She labels the 1968 Miss America Pageant as the moment when art and politics fused, culminating in a weeklong protest of art events.

The film mentions that minimalism was the popular art style of the time. Meant to be devoid of politics, this movement didn't match up with what was happening socially and politically. The feminist art movement worked to recognize contemporary political movements and social issues, creating a platform for awareness of these events.

Release
The film debuted at the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) 2010 as part of the Real to Reel category.

Digital Archive
In the film, Hershman states that the filming process, "has accumulated (roughly) 12,428 minutes of footage," and !W.A.R. shows only 83 minutes, leaving 12,343 minutes of footage out. It is part of a larger digital archive created to preserve the two decades of Hershmann Leeson's interviews that went into creating this film and is available through the Stanford University Libraries collection, !W.A.R. Voices of a Movement. According to the collection website, Hershmann Leeson desired this repository to "be shared with as wide an audience as possible."

Reception
Barry Kieth Grant praises the film in his Film International piece, "Leeson's film is a like a patchwork quilt of disparate footage, but in the end it all comes together to become an important feminist work. The film could well serve as required viewing for art and film students today."

Reviewer Ellen Druda says, "This powerful film will ignite even the tiniest spark of feminism in any woman's heart. Not only art lovers will come away with a deeper understanding of the movement and an appreciation for those who stood up and paved the way."

Richard Knight for the Windy City Times has a more critical view of the film, explaining, "Hershman Leeson succeeds in her goal to expose and pique the interest of the viewer to the radical feminist artists who used activist tactics to get their work shown, demanding parity with their male counterparts. However, by the time queer film historian B. Ruby Rich starts talking about how the lesbian artists didn't want to identify as artists because that label was considered bourgeois by their female counterparts, the movie has taken on an exclusionary air of its own - just like those 'womyn only' coffeehouses that existed 'back in the day.' So, while the film undercuts some of its own arguments by veering too strongly into the very separatist direction it decries - and annoyingly overlooks the artists feminist forebears (like O'Keeffe, Nevelson and Kahlo, for example) - !Women Art Revolution does offer plenty of food for thought for everyone."

Elisabeth Subrin states that "Fusing history with memoir, Lynn Hershman Leeson enlists multiple visual strategies to produce an elegantly layered visual and sonic web of politics and powerful emotion. "