User:ST927s/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Non-fungible token

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I've chosen this article to evaluate because I have a strong interest in the topic and feel like I won't get bored with working on the subject. I believe this article is especially important because NFTs are becoming even more popular and more information should be put onto the web about the and what exactly they are.

Evaluate the article
Specifics


 * More detailed information about the characteristics of NFTs can be added.
 * More about the history of NFTs should be added, that section is pretty short and not thorough.
 * Increased public awareness section lacks a lot of information, should explain more specifically about why NFTs have become such a big topic as of recently.
 * Section about the criticisms of NFTs is lacking specific citations, especially about the environmental concerns. Also information could possibly be explained in a simpler form so that the average reader can understand.

introductory statement is okay, could be simpler in wording.

No descriptions of major sections

Information is present in articles

Lead is concise but details are a bit confusing

Content is relevant

Content is not as up to date as it can be

Content is missing specifically in historical section

Article does represent a topic that should be covered more

Article is neutral

Bias isn't apparent

Viewpoints I feel are equally talked about in the article. More could be said about some sections

Minority viewpoints are described accurately

Doesn't intend to sway a viewer a certain way

Most sources are up to date but more citations could be added to specifically address certain information brought up in the article

Writing can be simplified in some areas but for the most part is clear and concise

Article is well written

Images are included and adhere to copyright regulations but images could be used in a more aesthetically pleasing way.

Talk Page has not been utilized as of yet. Article is rated C, we haven't addressed this topic yet in class.

Article needs a lot of work, its strengths are that for a lot of it, its short and to the point. Article can be improved by simplifying some sections, adding more citations, more historical facts, descriptions to major sections.

Article in its current form is underdeveloped.