User:STAT336-LE/Luke Tierney/Ertrempe Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

STAT336-LE


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:STAT336-LE/Luke Tierney


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

This article does a great job with structure, citation, and linking to other pages. The only changes I made in editing were minor grammatical corrections and revisions. I did not find any missing links for items mentioned within the draft. The article reads well and comes across as neutral. The sources seem adequate and reliable.I would consider separating the positions and the awards sections, and placing the awards section after the work section since that makes more since chronologically. Some of the position information is located in the education section as well which could be better served in the following section. One final thing I would consider adding to the article is more information into the work section about the contributions made to specific mathematical fields. Overall the article contains good, reliable, important information about Luke Tierney with few errors.