User:Sabmarriie/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Musee du Parfum
 * Article Evaluation
 * The articles content is relative to the topic. The introduction briefly explains what the topic is and where it is located. It contains small details of history, but not too deep. Only includes two sections, needs to add a description section. There are no images in the article. After reading the article, I have considered that it is written neutrally and is concise. There are no claims that might persuade a persons perspective. Each claim is cited. Sources do not have the date that they were created. Sources might not be reliable. It is missing a big chunk of history behind the topic. It has a history subject, but very small and not written to detail. There seems to be no one that is active on the Talk page. Overall, this article is a stub and is considered to be not that important.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Peaches and cream
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content that is in this article, is relevant to the topic. The introduction briefly explains what the topic is and where you can find it. There is one image in the article. Although, the image of the topic is not in the center, which could be confusing to what the topic looks like. The article's words are considered to be written neutrally. The viewpoints are underrepresented. This article has no citations. It is missing a lot of context, such as a description and history. The writing is clear and concise. Although not enough information is giving and is not broken down into major ideas. There are some interactions in the Talk page, but no change has been made. This article is considered to be in the stub class, does not have an importance rating.
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Abaniko


 * Article Evaluation
 * Includes a brief introduction sentence of what the topic is. This can be seen in each section. It is not detailed. The content is relative to the topic. Not sure if the content is up to date. The description is missing information. Along with sections that need to be added. The tone of the article seems to be neutral. Viewpoints are underrepresented. Each claim seems to be sourced. The most recent source was in 2009. The article seems to be concise and well written. Just lacks information. No spelling errors. Broken down in sections, but sections are needed to be added. There is an image, but the image does not represent what the topic is about. There is currently no one in the Talk page. As for the whole article, it is a stub class and considered to be low importance.


 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources