User:Sabmarriie/Pet culture/Anjsan01 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sabmarriie


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sabmarriie/Pet culture
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pet culture

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * The lead was created and written by you, so it is all new information that is added to article
 * Introductory sentence concisely and clearly describes the article topic
 * There are no other sections because it is a blank article, so it is hard to say if the lead addresses other sections, but if you make sections based on the lead it would work well.
 * The lead is concise and easy to read and understand

Content


 * Content is relevant to the topic
 * All content is up-to-date based on the references
 * No missing content or content that does not belong

Tone and Balance


 * The content is neutral and not biased towards as particular position
 * There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented
 * No attempted at persuasion in favor of any positions

Sources and References


 * All content is backed up by reliable secondary sources such as journals and scientific articles
 * The content is an accurate representation of the cited sources
 * The sources are very thorough and provide a lot of information on animal care, relationships, and culture.
 * The sources are all current
 * All links work

Organization


 * The content is concise, clear and easy to read
 * There are a few grammatical errors such as in the 5th sentence of the first sentence “increased”
 * Content only reflects the lead, but the lead is well-organized to shows a fluid order of events

Images and Media


 * There are no images or media

New Article


 * The article is supported by several reliable secondary sources independent of the subject
 * The list of sources accurately reflects available literature on the subject
 * Follows patterns of other similar articles – more information and sections do need to be added
 * Article is linked to other articles

Overall Impressions


 * The content has improves the overall quality of the article significantly, there is a good basis to which the remainder of the article can be written
 * Strengths: Has a very clear lead and it gives a lot of insight into the idea of pet culture. I like how you were able to cover a lot of information very briefly but still with clear detail.
 * Having more structure for the remainder of the article would be helpful to see how the lead reflects the overall article.