User:Sabrina Mierswa/Commamox/Ckosiak Peer Review

General info

 * I am reviewing Sabrina Mierswa's article.
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Comammox

Lead evaluation
The lead is very concise and introduces the topic well. I know exactly what the article is going to be about. It is missing a little intro for the major sections (Nitrospira is referenced but the ecosystems and applications are not.) Overall, the lead is well written and to the point. Possibly just include a short intro for the further sections.

Content evaluation
The content that is added is directly related to the topic. It is all up to date since dates such as 2015 are relatively recent. Some additional information could be added like: examples of bacteria that fall under this category. Also, the third section "Ecosystem of Comammox" could include more applications of its use in addition to its ecosystem. It would be cool to see the benefits and possibly drawbacks of these type of organisms or their growth conditions. But overall all the info is VERY concise which is nice to read!

Tone and balance evaluation
All the content is neutral and shows little bias. It is professionally written with a lot of scientific information backing it up. It is objectively written. The second sentence in the second paragraph seems a little oddly worded, but other than that no concerns.

Sources and references evaluation
There are a lot of citations in the article which is good and the sources all seem up to date. The links to the article sources worked and I had no trouble opening the articles. I like how you included a lot of links throughout the wikipedia article to other wikipedia articles!

Organization evaluation
The organization is good. It makes sense to split it up the way you did. No grammar errors that I noticed. Maybe look into adding more info about metabolism or applications, but if there is no sufficient information about that for Comammox that is understandable. The way you have it organized works.

Images and media evaluation
There are no images but it is difficult to add the images, so you did a great job linking other wikipedia articles to the article.

New Article Evaluation
I believe this article already existed based off of the view/edit history. Looks good to me.

Overall evaluation
I really enjoyed how objectively the article was written and concisely. A lot of scientific info which was great! It added important info related to the topic and I learned more about Comammox. Things to be improved upon: potentially adding more information about the growth of these type of organisms, metabolism, or more applications/uses. Overall, great job!