User:Sackboy27/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Magnesium

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Magnesium is an element that is widely researched in many fields of chemistry. In particular, magnesium plays a role in material, alloy, and biological processes. My first impression of the article was that it is quite detailed with lots of content.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section of the article is solid. However, it does not contain a summary of the articles lead sections. There is no mention of its uses as a metal or biological processes.

The content is relevant to magnesium, with up to date references. The article does not focus on one property of magnesium and focuses evenly on the many aspects. The only section that is less in content is History.

The tone of the article seems to be neutral, there are no persuading sentences or viewpoints that were controversial.

The sources of the article are working. There is a section that is missing citations (Useful compounds). The sources appear to be neutral.

The talk page is relevant to the article, and discussing the addition of new paragraphs.