User:SadiaAkhtar/Reciprocal teaching/Kieramalley Peer Review

.General info
- SadiaAkhtar
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * - User:SadiaAkhtar/Reciprocal teaching:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead

 * No lead or other headings, seems to just be an initial draft of ideas.

Content

 * The content is interesting, but the title of Reciprocal Teaching seems very loosely connected to the text, which starts mid sentence and focuses on the Zone of Proximal Development. With some mild grammar errors, it is unclear what direction the text is heading in.

Tone and Balance

 * With the little amount of information provided, it seems that the tone is very neutral and very clear to read. At this moment in time I would say it is off balance with the title of the draft and the body of the text.

Sources and References

 * No sources provided

Organization

 * As stated above, the text seems disconnected between body and title. The text needs to be organized with a Lead and clear subheadings.

Images and Media

 * N/A

For New Articles Only

 * Definitely needs more sources for notability

Overall impressions

 * I don't know if I'm doing this peer review assignment wrong, but there were two articles assigned to me by default with names I do not recognize. When I saw how brief they were, especially this one, I was confused. Overall, this article is severely underdeveloped with a lack of headings, references, and organization.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)