User:Sadie.Eggleston/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Architectural lighting design

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose the article, Architectural lighting design because I am an interior design major and this topic piqued my interest. This subject matters because creating an effective lighting design, where the user can function properly is crucial as a designer. My preliminary impression of the article was that it appears at first glance to be a well developed article with multiple different sections of information, however I did notice some issues with citations.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

-Well developed lead section, good summary

-Overall relevant content, but should have more updated facts throughout the article

-Neutral and unbiased point of view, but could be balanced out with more information in some sections

-Not many grammatical errors or spelling mistakes

-Needs to be organized better to further understanding

-Images could be organized better, but helps to enhance the article overall

-Majority of sources are up to date and reliable, links work, but some are blogs/magazines

-Also there is a notice stating citations need to be verified for a section of the article

-C-class, underdeveloped, many discussions on talk page, part of a Wiki project