User:Sadie Shank/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Grace VanderWaal
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. It correlates to the article I'm doing because it's about a person and I like Grace Vanderwaal's music.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? it's long, but concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? mostly
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? there doesn't appear to be
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes, pretty much

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? barely, there are only two images
 * Are images well-captioned? no, they simply say what year it was taken and what she was doing. Ex: "VanderWaal performing in 2018"
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? talks about her social media and followers, disagreements about Forbes, dates, a big argument that got people kicked off, proposals for edits
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? no
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? there are a lot of arguments taking place whereas we discussed how we're not supposed to be arguing on the subject at hand

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? it's very complete and covers a lot of information
 * What are the article's strengths? the amount of information included
 * How can the article be improved? people can be more respecting of each other in the talk pages so more edits can be done, it can be slightly updated
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? it's very well developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: