User:SageOfSaudade/Women's Democratic Movement/Lilypond87 Peer Review

General info
Women’s Democratic Movement
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:SageOfSaudade/Women's Democratic Movement
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User:SageOfSaudade/Women's Democratic Movement:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User:SageOfSaudade/Women's Democratic Movement:

Evaluate the drafted changes
The citations look well done and complete for the most part. I would say something that stands out is the switch between acronyms for names of organizations and the full spelled out name of the organizations. I would just say consistency with one or the other would be best and to have at least one fully spelled out version of the acronym if you are going to use it throughout the article, which I think was done for the most part. For the context aspect, I feel that the article remained neutral for the most part, which can be hard to do with controversial figures. Overall I felt this was done to the best of everyone’s ability to remain neutral despite the figure of Francisco Franco and his rule. I would say maybe adding a little more to the rise of feminism section and elaborating on how it coincides with the Franco regime would be useful as a reader to understanding the whole context of the period and the role of the groups within the feminist rise.

I would say the only other thing would be to work on the organization of the page with multiple sections being quite similar and having some overlap that could be combined or placed next to each other. Further, I think a section on the overall impact of the Women’s Democratic Movement on feminism or its’ legacies and not just its downfall would be a good way to end the paper.

Well done!