User:SageOfSaudade/Women's Democratic Movement/PrometheusDOW Peer Review

General info
User:SageOfSaudade/Women's Democratic Movement
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:SageOfSaudade/Women's Democratic Movement
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Movimento Democrático de Mulheres

Evaluate the drafted changes
The group's Wiki article focuses on the History of the Women's Democratic Movement, and there is no Lead section to review. Although, I do think a lead section would be beneficial, as I understand the History of the Movement, but not really what the movement stood for or what they represented.

The content of the article is very relevant to the topic, but I was just a bit confused as there is already an extensive Wikipedia Article on the Women's Democratic Movement in English. I think that the group needs to give the full definition for the acronyms provided as I was confused about the acronym PCE. I do think that the References are great, they come from different years, which can be beneficial to see the progression of attitudes towards the movement and its impact. But none of that is reflected in the article, the article's draft only includes the history of the party. The References also do not connect to any of the statements made in the article, I am sure that they found the information from the sources, but they just are not linked and connected actively in the writing. The sources are from a wide range of authors and times which I think are beneficial to the article, but because the article just focuses on the history of the movement, I don't think the sources are utilized well enough.

The content added is very neutral from my understanding and there were no arguments or claims made throughout the whole text that are biased towards one position. It is clearly written and not too confusing. I do think some acronyms could be explained better, but the writing seemed concise and clear.

The content is backed up by a source at times, but they are not linked, the authors name is given in parenthesis after some statements, but I think more need to be included or attached to some of the statements made.

As of now there are no images included within the article.