User:Sagefletcher99/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Large marine ecosystem
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The article stayed relevant to the topic of large marine ecosystems and was written neutrally. Each claim luckily had a citation to back it up. A few citations were unreliable and took me nowhere, however, most of the citations worked and were reliable. The article does tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps Ecoregions and Marine Life. The Talk page mentioned the article was a C-class article with a low importance rating. There is no comments from other Wikipedians on the page.
 * The article stayed relevant to the topic of large marine ecosystems and was written neutrally. Each claim luckily had a citation to back it up. A few citations were unreliable and took me nowhere, however, most of the citations worked and were reliable. The article does tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps Ecoregions and Marine Life. The Talk page mentioned the article was a C-class article with a low importance rating. There is no comments from other Wikipedians on the page.


 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title: Echinoderm
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic being about Echinoderms and was written neutrally. Every claim has one or more citations attached to them. All the citations seem to be reliable. The article does tackle two of Wikipedia's equity gaps Animals and Marine Life. The Talk page mentioned the article was a C-class article with a high importance rating. There are no comments from other Wikipedians on the page.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic being about Echinoderms and was written neutrally. Every claim has one or more citations attached to them. All the citations seem to be reliable. The article does tackle two of Wikipedia's equity gaps Animals and Marine Life. The Talk page mentioned the article was a C-class article with a high importance rating. There are no comments from other Wikipedians on the page.

Option 3

 * Article title: Marine microbial symbiosis
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic of marine microbial symbiosis except a random section about biotechnology that doesn't include anything about the topic. The article is written neutrally as well. Each claim does have a citation and these citations do seem reliable. The article does tackle two Wikipedia equity gaps Microbiology and Marine Life. The Talk page mentioned the article was a C-class article with a low importance rating. There is no comments from other Wikipedians on the page.
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic of marine microbial symbiosis except a random section about biotechnology that doesn't include anything about the topic. The article is written neutrally as well. Each claim does have a citation and these citations do seem reliable. The article does tackle two Wikipedia equity gaps Microbiology and Marine Life. The Talk page mentioned the article was a C-class article with a low importance rating. There is no comments from other Wikipedians on the page.


 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title: Marine fungi
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The article's contents are relevant to the topic of marine fungi and seemingly written neutrally. Each claim has at least one citation attached to it. The article does tackle two of Wikipedia;s equity gaps Fungi and Microbiology. The Talk page mentioned the article was a C-class article with a high importance rating. There are no comments from other Wikipedians on the page.
 * The article's contents are relevant to the topic of marine fungi and seemingly written neutrally. Each claim has at least one citation attached to it. The article does tackle two of Wikipedia;s equity gaps Fungi and Microbiology. The Talk page mentioned the article was a C-class article with a high importance rating. There are no comments from other Wikipedians on the page.


 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title: Economic impact of harmful algal blooms
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The article's contents are relevant to the topic of harmful algal blooms and seemingly written neutrally. Each claim has at least one citation attached to it however, some citations don't work when clicked on. The article does tackle quite a few of Wikipedia's equity gaps Algae, Environment, Fisheries and Fishing, and Limology and Oceanography. The Talk page mentions that this article was a subject to Wiki course assignments and labeled as a C-class with a rating of high importance. There are no comments from other Wikipedians on the page.
 * The article's contents are relevant to the topic of harmful algal blooms and seemingly written neutrally. Each claim has at least one citation attached to it however, some citations don't work when clicked on. The article does tackle quite a few of Wikipedia's equity gaps Algae, Environment, Fisheries and Fishing, and Limology and Oceanography. The Talk page mentions that this article was a subject to Wiki course assignments and labeled as a C-class with a rating of high importance. There are no comments from other Wikipedians on the page.


 * Sources