User:Saifk72/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Bamboo painting

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article articulates a tradition that is both interesting and important to a group of people. It is a niche topic that is artistic and historical. It carries significance with Asian people.

Evaluate the article
The article immediately begins with a concise explanation of what bamboo painting is. The lead is both present and informative. It includes a section that leads to all the article's other sections. The article content is relevant to the topic. It includes the backstory of the topic while staying on track. The sources are not current and it appears the content may not be up to date. However, this topic seems to be under represented and fits Wikipedia's equity gaps. All the content presented is in place and belongs. There is nothing out of place. The sources aren't exactly present. The links presented aren't working. Since they don't really work, there isn't much to judge. The article is concise, well explained and very easy to understand. There aren't any grammatical errors. The images are already visually appealing and are included in a way that makes sense with the format of the article. The article's talk page includes a correction regarding translation. There is no rating for the article. The comment also discusses what is on their own talk page regarding a separate article. The article's strengths are that it is concise and detailed and very informative. It offers visual images and the article itself is very easy to understand. The article appears to be slightly undeveloped. Since there aren't many references, it appears to be that there is much more information needed. Some suggestions would be to make the article more trust worthy and including more information.