User:Saihaj/Steam locomotive/Haoyu Cui Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Saihaj


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Saihaj/Steam locomotive


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Steam locomotive

Evaluate the drafted changes
Structure - The content added to the article is a part of independent content. The claims in it are relatively neutral, without personal subjective opinions, and show the pollution ability that steam locomotives can cause through objective data. However, the added information is not subdivided to tell the direction of future improvement of steam locomotives, or the advantages of corresponding alternatives today. However, since this part is relevant to the topic, doing so will make the article better and more comprehensive in showing the advantages and disadvantages of steam locomotives. And the article mentions the impact of steam locomotives on climate change, as well as the current efforts to reduce these impacts, so the overall structure of the article is good.

Content - The added content is related to the content of the article itself. Through the latest objective data collected, it shows the pollution ability that steam locomotives can cause, as well as the possible improvement directions and methods of steam locomotives in the future, and whether they are still should be used. Instead, it simply provides a factual overview of the effects of steam locomotives on climate change, and objective efforts to reduce those effects, which fits nicely with wikipedia's neutrality. At the same time, the overall content of the content added in the draft is smooth, without redundant explanations or overly technical terms, ensuring that all readers can read it. In addition, the article hardly contains any spelling or grammatical errors.

Coverage & Neutrality - Content added to an article does not change its overall balance. While the information included is focused on only one section, that section previously had little information compared to the rest of the paper. Therefore, the added information does not bias the article towards this section, but rather makes it more balanced overall.

References - The content that has been added appears to be accurate and reflects the information contained in the source. All added sections are supported by citations. These references were all written within the last decade and are all reliable sources, not articles on random websites. These references are also written by different types of authors and published in different countries. The reference can be improved by adding more sources. This will further validate the information contained in the article, and it will also make the reference more accurately representative of the available literature.

Overall - In summary, the pre-existing articles don't really explain how steam locomotives cause climate change, just how mitigations are done and where they are. Thus, the added information makes the content of the article richer and more objective overall. You can try to develop more aspects and cite more literature and reference materials to make the overall content more complete and objective.