User:Sainsf/sandbox/trial

Quick links

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Biology GAN
 * DYK process
 * DYK nominations
 * FAN
 * Precious
 * Copyvio detector
 * Dab detector
 * Pageviews


 * 1) Johann Christian Polycarp Erxleben
 * 2) René Lesson


 * 1) Warn the vandal. Access the vandal's talk page and warn them by posting an appropriate warning template from the following list. It is not necessary to start with the level one warning, particularly when faced with especially egregious or offensive vandalism, when the vandal has damaged multiple articles, or when the vandal has created an account with no positive contributions across more than one editing session.
 * 2) * Level one: This is a gentle caution regarding unconstructive edits; it encourages new editors to use a sandbox for test edits. This is the mildest warning.
 * 3) * Level two: This warning is also fairly mild, though it explicitly uses the word 'vandalism' and links to this Wikipedia policy.
 * 4) * Level three: This warning is sterner. It is the first to warn that further disruptive editing or vandalism may lead to a block.
 * 5) * Level four: This is the sharpest vandalism warning template, and indicates that any further disruptive editing may lead to a block without warning.

WIAGA

 * Is the article well-written?
 * Does the article use adequate and reliable sources, and make frequent citations to them? Does it contain original research?
 * Is the article broad in its coverage, addressing the main aspects but at the same time remaining focused on the main subject?
 * Is the article neutral?
 * Is the article stable?
 * Are the images relevant, having suitable captions? Are they tagged with their copyright status or are properly licensed for non-free content)?
 * Is the article neutral?
 * Is the article stable?
 * Are the images relevant, having suitable captions? Are they tagged with their copyright status or are properly licensed for non-free content)?
 * Are the images relevant, having suitable captions? Are they tagged with their copyright status or are properly licensed for non-free content)?
 * Are the images relevant, having suitable captions? Are they tagged with their copyright status or are properly licensed for non-free content)?

The ancient fossils of C. sivalensis and C. antiquus have been traced in the Pinjor formation of Shiwalik Hills in India. Fossils of subgenus Paracamelus within genus Camelus were found in western Siberia, China, near the Sea of Azov, and the northern coast of the Black Sea. In the Pliocene, Camelus species ranged much farther south in Africa, and in northern Africa, remains of C. thomasi have been found. In Near East Camelus remains date back to 0.6 million years ago in Ubeidiya in Jordan Valley. In Pliocene, the African range of Camelus extended as far as Tanzania into the south.
 * Dromedary


 * Canada lynx