User:Sallyfried/Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act/Msociallyaware17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sallyfried


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sallyfried/Personal_Responsibility_and_Work_Opportunity_Act?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act
 * Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall


 * The additions will add feminist and intersectional perspectives on the issue to add depth to the article. I also appreciated seeing additions to the whole article and not solely on one section.

Content

Is there missing content that is missing or content that does not belong (Is gender part of the content)?


 * Yes. While the article covers gender, the new content adds additional information on the criticisms and impact of PRWORA.

Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia’s equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? (feminist and intersectional insights)


 * Yes, the new content add more information on gender and the intersection between abuse and work requirements.

Tone and Balance

Is the content added neutral?


 * As discussed, certain sections read as making an argument. Recommend related statements back to studies and adding scholars who highlighted these critiques.

Are there any claims that appear heavily toward a particular position? (universal lens)


 * Similar to above, the addition of the “Violation of Women’s Constitutional Rights” adds an important perspective. However, it reads argumentative. I recommend citing the studies to help balance the section. As a whole, this adds to the “Consequence” and “Criticism” of PRWORA.

Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?


 * Not all the sections do. There is information laid out on the impact and consequences of PRWORA.

Sources and References

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary sourced of information? (Empirical/peer reviewed)


 * Yes

Are the sources current?


 * Yes

Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?


 * This is difficult to determine. However, I think the sources were diverse in terms of content and where they came from.