User:Salma yassin 2000/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Feminism and modern architecture
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * answer: I have chosen this article because it relates feminism to architecture and that architecture is not limited to female architects.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? not much
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? consice

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? not much
 * Is the content up-to-date? it was created in 2008 and was last edited on January 2018
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? yes there is some missing content

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? no it is biased toward feminism
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? its is generally biased towards female architects and their outstanding abilities in architecture
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? it tries to persuade the reader that females have a different look and view on how houses can be built with better and more suitable ways that fit the whole family.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes, it has reliable references
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes, they contain the houses mentioned above in the article for further reading
 * Are the sources current? no they are old
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes they do

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? no very clear
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? no grammatical or spelling errors
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? it is organized but does not reflect the major poits of the topic, it gives examples right away without explaining the main purpose clearly

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no, the only image is the female symbol
 * Are images well-captioned? there are no images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? there are no images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? there are no images

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? the talk page is empty
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? cannot find the rating. it is a wikitext
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? we haven't talked about it yet

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? not so good
 * What are the article's strengths? examples and references backing up these examples
 * How can the article be improved? more explanation and clarification about the main purpose if the topic
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? poorly developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: