User:Sam121302/Flower hat jelly/Corgsi05 Peer Review

General info
Sam121302
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Sam121302/Flower hat jelly - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Flower hat jelly - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The information added to this article is relevant and interesting! The additions are only fact with no opinions, and no attempt to convince a reader to think one way over another. It is all neutral and intended to inform the reader rather than make them think a specific way. All of the information comes from sources that appear to be reliable and sophisticated, as well as mostly modern. They are used properly and reflect appear thorough. They also appear to be specifically for education and research rather than just random websites. Everything seems to be straight to the point and overall well-written with no grammar or spelling mistakes. This unique organism has such a short article, and it was a great choice to add to it for your project.

Everything looks good and you are well on your way to being ready for a final publishing!

(Just have to add how cool this jelly is by the way. I never knew about this one and it's really fascinating!)