User:SamJU23/Granma (newspaper)/Gb825 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

Hey! I noticed you haven't made any changes to your article, so I would advise you to get started! Overall the article is well written and provides a foundation of knowledge on the subject, but it could be improved.

I just wanted to share some suggestions I have:


 * Try to elaborate on the topics included in the article and add new sections and citations where they are needed
 * Include more information on the newspaper’s history and role in Cuban and global history
 * I would suggest including more information on why the newspaper was created and how it was founded
 * I would also suggest adding information on the paper’s impact, controversy, and notable writers
 * Adding photos of newspaper editions would be good too,
 * You could also add photos of persons, places, or events relevant to the newspaper and its articles
 * The Spanish version of the article includes more information on the newspaper’s history, so I would recommend trying to look at that for inspiration
 * I would also recommend you try to add more links into the article where necessary
 * Definitely be sure to find lots of reliable sources, since the article is lacking in sources

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? SamJU23
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Granma (newspaper)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No new content has been added
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? No content was added
 * Is the content added up-to-date? No content was added
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? No content was added
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? There are viewpoints that are underrepresented
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No content was added
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? One source is not current and the other source is more recent, but still not very current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No content was added
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No content was added
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No content was added

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?