User:SamPopham00/Cuban Immigration to Philadelphia/Seththrowgen Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SamPopham00


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SamPopham00/Cuban_Immigration_to_Philadelphia?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead
The lead currently features a brief description of the entire article but only slightly highlights the sections listed below. The lead is pretty concise but I feel like there could be more detail regarding what specific economic and political reasons played a part. (i.e programs, incidents, new laws, shifting market, lack of labor, etc).

Content
All three sections currently featured tie back into the main subject quite well. In terms of being up to date, it would probably help to find more recent sources if possible as most are from the early 2000s. Again, this might not be possible simply due to the availability of information but it's something to consider. I want to say that more content is coming as the political section in particular is sparse in details.

Tone and Balance
The article is not persuasive. The edits feel very report like which is appropriate for this project.

Sources and References
Similar to above more recent sources would bolster the information if possible. Other than that, there is a diverse set of sources and the content reflects what is present in the sources. More sources will probably be needed to add even more to the article.

Organization
The sections are well organized and are easy to read. What might help in the future is a table of contents for easier navigation if you plan on adding more sections. There is an error in the section "Economic Factors" in the first sentence of the second paragraph:

"as a result brought on many migrant workers under their employ." perhaps should be

as a result brought on many migrant workers under their employment."?

Other than that there does not appear to be any more grammatical or spelling errors.

Images and Media
The images are appropriately captioned and I think adhere to copyright regulations but sources may be needed. (to be honest, not that sure so I'd review those).

For New Articles Only
There is definitely a handful of sources and as mentioned before, more would help. It would also be beneficial to link to similar topics/mention other events that connect to the topic. All in all though the format is great and looks quite like other wikipedia articles. It definitely has more than the necessary 2-3 sources.

Overall Impressions
The content is a solid foundation and with more information/details it will make for a strong article that showcases the topic well.