User:SamTyler526/Trà Kiệu/Mminerp3 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SamTyler526


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:SamTyler526/Trà Kiệu


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
This article is off to a good start but definitely needs some more information added! The lead section has some good information but I think it could be improved by adding more of an overview of all the sections once they are added and moving some of the details into their own section. There is a lot of information about the sites location that could be categorized under their own section, a map would also be a really good addition to help readers understand where this site is located. As far as content it looks like you have some sections set up, they are just missing the information. I think these sections look like they could provide a lot of information about the site! The section about chronology has a lot of good information and is very clear in describing the major differences in roof tiles. If it is possible maybe provide some information on when these phases possibly took place and maybe the number of roof tiles they found to help come to this idea. This article does a good job of using a neutral tone and presenting the information in non opinionated way and seems to have a good organizational structure with proper headings and a lead and reference section. The information provided in this article seem to come from reliable sources and are cited in the article which is super important! The only thing I would change about the references is to make sure they all look the same under the reference section and delete the ones that are repeated. Overall this article needs some more information but it seems to be off to a good start with good organization and proper citations!