User:Samantha.Maina/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Pelvic examination

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it is included in the "see also" section of my assigned article for my Wikipedia course. It matters because it's important to verify that the links provided on the page contain accurate medical information. The article was concise and covered relevant information in a neutral tone.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead of the article is well composed. It clearly states what the article is about, and identifies the aspects and uses of a pelvic examination. It also addresses changes in guidelines in terms of when a pelvic examination is required. The article is well organized - the order of the sections as well as the structures of each section make it easy to follow along with. The sources appear to be current and relevant. The article is neutral and not persuasive; it does include the expectations of a patient and language to use during a pelvic examination, which enhances the article. Overall, the article is very informative and well organized.