User:SamanthaGuirado1234/Girl, Interrupted/Elyonn Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SamanthaGuirado1234


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Girl, Interrupted


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Girl, Interrupted

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

•	Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - yes a new lead has been added to reflect the content that is within the article. It’s clear, concise and well written. It doesn’t exactly describe the articles major sections but I is still appropriate

Content

•	Is the content added relevant to the topic? - yes most of the content is relevant to the topic as it gives a good description of the book and writers inspiration. It is also up to date

•	Is there content that does not belong? - I don’t know how necessary it is to go into every detail of the casts. I feel maybe it’s a little too much information and can be summarized. However the information is accurate and well written.

Tone and Balance

•	Is the content added neutral? - the content added is neutral in tone and does not attempt to gear the reader towards any direction but rather informs them.

Sources and References

•	Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - the content is backed up by reliable sources. The links work and they are referred to appropriately and as Wikipedia guidelines suggest.

Organization

•	Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - the content is well written and easy to read. It is grammatically correct and broken down into well categorized sections and subheadings.

Images and Media

•	Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? - there aren’t a lot of images used in the article and I think it could benefit from a little more. There however is the intro image which I believe is pretty appropriate for the article.

Overall impressions

I believe the content has definitely improved the overall quality of this article as it goes in depth and is able to back up information with reliable sources. It is written in good academic language and follows all Wikipedia guidelines.