User:Samantha R Taylor/sandbox

Article Evaluation

 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article seems neutral for the most part but, if it were to swing one way or the other it would definitely lean towards having heavy criticism and disapproval.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links do work for the citations I checked and they align with the claims.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Most of the information presented is from the founder of the Enneagram who came up with this system in the 1950s-1970s. The enneagram has become very popular today so I think there could stand to be more information about new developments of the Enneagram.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is a lot of talk about the wings of the Enneagram and also how there is little to no praise in the article.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any Wiki-projects?
 * This article is rated in the C-Class on the project’s quality scale. Also, the article is rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
 * The article is a part of Wikiproject Skepticism.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We haven’t discussed the enneagram in much depth in class but when we have mentioned it, we talked about what it is lacking and how it could apply to the workplace. The article on the Enneagram of Personality covers a lot more than we have talked about including the origin, purpose, and details of subsets.