User:Samanthalunarivera/Publicity stunt/MattK82002 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Publicity Stunt Group


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * No draft yet


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Publicity stunt

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

I think the lead to your article is strong. It is concise and gets to the point. You give examples of what a publicity stunt could be, and you give a strong example in the last paragraph in the lead about the world's largest pizza which I think will help people understand publicity stunts better. The only thing I think is unnecessary is link the the Gucci Mane song, even through the song is titled "Publicity Stunt" I don't think it adds much to the article. If you want to include it maybe add it in the Content section of the article.

Content:

The section is small for know, but I'm sure you will add more. Some ideas I have for what you could add are obviously more example of publicity stunts I'm sure there are many more to add. Another section you could add are negative and positive aspects of publicity stunts. Have there been publicity stunts that have resulted in more sales? Another section could be about publicity stunts that have been successful and unsuccessful. Another section could be about "are publicity stunts deceptive," is there an unethical aspect about them or are they harmless. These were just some ideas I had.

Tone and Balance:

So far you seem to be neutral in tone. I don't see any biases when I read through the article.

Sources and References:

I think a way to improve this section would be to add news articles written about the events discussed thus far. This would strengthen the credibility it would also prove the point where it says "it shocked people," by adding a source that proves it had that effect on people. I would also try to use more trustworthy sources when you start to edit the article since some of the sources are just random articles that don't seem to reliable.

Organization:

So far the article seems organized It is broken up into section, and once you start adding your own sections I'm sure you will continue the trend.

Images and Media:

The images included so far are good. I think you should include more about the images under the "Notable Publicity Stunts" section. The descriptions under the images are clear and concise while also explaining what is happening well.