User:Samayfield/Developmental toxicity/Zwiles95 Peer Review

This article is incredibly well written and has been put a lot of time and information into it. It displays a very good understanding of the concepts as well as the history of it. There are a few grammatical errors in it, like incomplete sentences and spelling errors. The article stays on topic with a good concise lead. It needs to be a little more organized, because it feels like some of the developmental toxicants should be in their respective paragraphs.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)