User:Sambaguhin/The Canadian Press/Natasharintoul Peer Review

General info

 * Sambaguhin
 * The Canadian Press

Lead
- Lead is clear but article is very short so doesn't reflect all of the information available

Content
- Content is relevant but could add more information

- More up to date information could be provided seen as most of the information is from 2010 and before

Sources and References
- Most of the information is backed up with sources however some of the links refer back to other wikipedia articles. In order to make the statements stronger some more reliable sources could be added

Organization
- For the information available I think the article is written in an organized way. If more information is added more sections can also be introduced to organize it.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?