User:SameenW/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Bilibili: (Bilibili)
 * Bilibili is one of the most popular video sharing website in China. As a Chinese, I'm quite familiar with it and wanna explore whether the english version article should be improve or not.

Lead

 * The Lead first gives a brief summary of "what Bilibili is", and all the information here is present in the article. It's concise, but lacks a clear frame work, some of the major sections are not mentioned in this part.

Lead evaluation: Could be improved

Content
The content is closely related to Bilibili, almost all the descriptions here are built around this topic. The content has included something happened in Sep. 2019, but I also noticed that the figure of user number mentioned in this article is still in 2005. In the "Controversy" part, it provide a case of Cai Xukun which I think is only one case happened on the platform of Bilibili, some more typical cases should be added to describe the controversial things.

Content evaluation: Could be improved

Tone and Balance
The article is quite neutral, it is just an introduction of Bilibili, and consist little subjective judgment.

Tone and balance evaluation: Good

Sources and References
Most of the contents in this article are cited, and the source here are quite reliable. I checked about 10 links, they all worked.

Sources and references evaluation: Good

Organization
From my point of view, the article is easy to read, although there may be some grammatical errors. But I think it can be more logical, in other words, its frame can still be improved. Also, some more details can be put in, that would help to introduce Bilibili in a more well-rounded way.

Organization evaluation: Could be improved

Images and Media
This article only include one image that is Bilibili's logo, it's essential and helped. Maybe the image of its official mascots should be added as well.

Images and media evaluation: Could be improved

Checking the talk page
This article rated C-class in WikiProject Websites / Computing, WikiProject China / Entertainment, WikiProject Anime and manga. In the talk page, people criticized the original editor who ignore other user's suggestions and insist to add some less relevant content. And some also pointed that the language skill should be improve which I think is quite important. As this article is an important source for non-Chinese people to know about such a Chinese website at first time, and some English grammar errors would not make sense to English speakers. Some other people modified the link, and some change the certain proper nouns and gives some reasons. In this talk page people are not strictly follow the way that we discussed in tutorial class, such as the "editing war" part, it's just shows us what happened when two people have different opinions during the editing process.

Talk page evaluation: Good

Overall impressions
Overall the article roughly introduced people what Bilibili is, and provided some relevant information about this website. Some of the information in this article stays up-to-date but some are not. The grammar issue should be paid more attention. And some more detailed information and images should be added to help people better understand. I think it still can be improved a lot.

Overall evaluation: Could be improved

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: