User:SameerSap99/Economic development in India/Bibliography

Patnaik, Prabhat. “Editorial Note.” Social Scientist, vol. 43, no. 3/4, 2015, pp. 1–2. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/24372931.

This source gives an alternative interpretation to the successes and limitations of the Nehru-Mahalanobis Strategy and therefore, the Second Five Year Plan. Patnaik begins by providing the reader with the general interpretation of the heightened emphasis on the development of heavy industries and then providing a rationale. Next, the author gives common counterarguments such as claiming the real constraint on the grwoth of Indian exports lay on the supply side not on the demand side. Thus, India may have exploited the world economy to increase their growth. This paper is useful to my work as we are given yet another perspective. Nehru's strategy attempted to boost land-augmented investments while expanding the Mining and Mineral-Based industries.

Bhatia, V.G. (1990). [www.jstor.org/stable/4396620 "Nehru Mahalanobis Model"] Check |url= value (help). Economic and Political Weekly. Retrieved 7 December 2019.

This source is an opinion piece on the Nehru Mahalanobis. The anti-imperialist, anti-establishment bias is clearly present, however, the argument lists many limitations to the Second Five Year Plan. Specifically, Bhatia emphasizes the lack of support for education, health services, rural infrastructure in an attempt to industrialize India. He argues that this promised employment for India but the poor had no sense of upliftment. This editorial will be useful when I discuss the current discourse and the model of development. It provides a number of arguments against and some counter-arguments.

Corbridge, Stuart. “The Political Economy of Development in India Since Independence.” Routledge Handbook of South Asian Politics, 2009, doi:10.4324/9780203878187.ch21. In this text, Corbridge discusses the economic and political factors contributing the wage inequality in post-reform India. Britains effect on the economy is also explored in relation to Nehru's policies. This piece will be useful for me to provide a variety of perspectives on the effect that Nehruvian economics provided for India.

Delong, J. Bradford. “Chapter 7. India since Independence: An Analytic Growth Narrative.” In Search of Prosperity, 2003, pp. 184–204., doi:10.1515/9781400845897-009. DeLong provides a traditional economic view of Indian politics following Great Britain's Power. The author delves into economic theory explaining simple growth theory in terms of India's worker output. The more mathematical/economic perspective of growth theory will be useful in encyclopedic writing.

Banerjee, Rajabrata, and Saikat Sinha Roy. “Human Capital, Technological Progress and Trade: What Explains India's Long Run Growth?” Journal of Asian Economics, vol. 30, 28 Oct. 2013, pp. 15–31., doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2013.12.003. Bannerjee and Roy discuss factors that have contributed to India's long-run growth. Different perspectives are given on reasons affecting India's quantum rise in economic power starting in the 1980s. These studies show that human capital is the largest factor with domestic capability building and technology spillovers being secondary.