User:Samf4u/sandbox

Wikipedia's purpose is to benefit readers by acting as a widely accessible and free encyclopedia; a comprehensive written compendium that contains information on all branches of knowledge. The goal of a Wikipedia article is to present a neutrally written summary of existing mainstream knowledge in a fair and accurate manner with a straightforward, "just-the-facts style". Articles should have an encyclopedic style with a formal tone instead of essay-like, argumentative, promotional or opinionated writing.
 * User:Samf4u/sandboxcargoflight1290
 * User:Samf4u/sandbox1
 * User:Samf4u/sandbox2
 * User:Samf4u/sandbox3
 * User:Samf4u/sandbox4
 * User:Samf4u/sandbox5
 * User:Samf4u/sandbox6
 * User:Samf4u/sandbox7
 * User:Samf4u/sandbox8

Naming aviation accident victims in articles has been discussed multiple times. -
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Northwest_Airlines_Flight_255#Should_Cecelia_Cichan_be_mentioned_by_name?
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:1943_Gibraltar_B-24_crash#Question
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Galaxy_Airlines_Flight_203
 * Remove "all" from infobox per a discussion at Template talk:Infobox aircraft occurrence
 * Change call sign format per MOS:CAPS and a discussion at Talk:Germanwings Flight 9525
 * WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Accidents)
 * Huggle/Users
 * Help:Archiving a talk page
 * One IP look up tool https://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/2601:193:8300:1300:6465:f061:a6a7:63a1
 * Date format by country
 * One IP look up tool https://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/2601:193:8300:1300:6465:f061:a6a7:63a1
 * Date format by country


 * After AFD an article add it to WikiProject Deletion sorting/Aviation

Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass Please put down the WP:STICK, and step away from the conflict, or you are likely to be on the receiving end of a WP:BOOMERANG. Perhaps you should take a short break.

Wikipedia is a source of knowledge. Be friendly about providing knowledge to people

Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you

An encyclopedia is not where nascent topics are first exposed to external and independent publication, but where we write about things the world has already sufficiently written about, that have become mainstream knowledge

Readers should not be dropped into the middle of the subject from the first word; they should be eased into it.

Mental models are fuzzy, incomplete, and imprecisely stated. Furthermore, within a single individual, mental models change with time, even during the flow of a single conversation. The human mind assembles a few relationships to fit the context of a discussion. As debate shifts, so do the mental models. Even when only a single topic is being discussed, each participant in a conversation employs a different mental model to interpret the subject. Fundamental assumptions differ but are never brought into the open. Goals are different but left unstated. It is little wonder that compromise takes so long. And even when consensus is reached, the underlying assumptions may be fallacies that lead to laws and programs that fail. The human mind is not adapted to understanding correctly the consequences implied by a mental model. A mental model may be correct in structure and assumptions but, even so, the human mind—either individually or as a group consensus—is apt to draw the wrong implications for the future.[10]

Once again, commenting on other editors rather than the topic at hand is the last resort for someone who has nothing to offer. It's a way of deflecting from the real issue. (ie: if you don't know then simply claim I don't know and hope no one sees through the smoke screen.) What I know is you don't know me, thus your comments do not bother me, they only reflect on you. Since I am not claiming to know, but only that I've read in sources, you are not talking about me but rather the multitude of experts in the field.


 * Forgive me if I don't take your word for it, but as far as anyone can tell you are just some IP who could be anyone from a child to an expert yourself, who knows? That's why we don't take people's word. We require them to bring reliable sources. Any expert should have plenty of them. Your language suggests a dislike for the Japanese (or at least a preference for the Chinese) so do you think it's possible that you may have a personal bias that is clouding your judgment?


 * I would love to add information about this if it exists. I've asked you to help me find it. You must have gotten it from somewhere (that is, if you are not making it up) so I don't understand why you can't show your sources to us. I'm trying to help, and it would be great if you'd stop fighting and collaborate. User:Zaereth

Move new aircraft article to main space checklist
Holosun HS503GU
 * 1) Add header to Talk page
 * 2) Add article to proper new article list ie: New articles (Aircraft)
 * 3) Change quantity of list in step 2
 * 4) If necessary remove from Missing articles list ie: WikiProject Aircraft/Missing articles/5
 * 5) Add categories

Wikipedia abbreviations External links WP:AIRCRASH
 * Rewrite summary per project consensus: summarize facts and circumstances, leave the causes for the article body
 * Portal bar goes at the bottom per guidelines. Remove arbitrary collection of links in See also section: establish similarity based on reliable sources before adding any
 * To request Move db move


 * help:cheatsheet
 * External links
 * warning tags Template messages/User talk namespace


 * Also see Template:Cite news for newspaper articles


 * Also see Template:Cite web


 * Also see Template:Cite magazine


 * Also see Template:Cite book


 * Also see Template:Cite journal

Hello, I'm Samf4u. Two of your recent edits appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my my talk page.

Hello, I'm Samf4u. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my my talk page.

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Hello, I'm Samf4u. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Hello, I'm Samf4u. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Inter-Services Intelligence activities in India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -

Please stop making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United Airlines Flight 173. The changes you made were unnecessary and introduced grammatical errors. Be careful or you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unconfirmed content to Wikipedia, as you did to 1967 USS Forrestal fire, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Inter-Services Intelligence, you may be blocked from editing.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Inter-Services Intelligence activities in India.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

(burden lies on the editor who adds the information)

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (139.55.35.76) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing!