User:Samgl04/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nanahuatzin

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because it related back to the Native North Americans class I am currently taking. It's rather short and could use a lot of citations and be expanded. This article is underdeveloped.

Evaluate the article

 * The section "Aztec tradition" lacks any citations throughout the whole text, the title is also pretty broad and the text talks solely about myths instead of Aztec tradition surrounding Nanahuatzin as a whole.
 * Similarly, the opening paragraph has a pretty large lack of proper citations and sources. A french book, Histoyre du Mechique, is mentioned but not properly cited nor does the Wikipedia page linked to it exist. The use of "He is probably an aspect of Xolotl" is somewhat vague and sounds unsure. Citing Ángel María Garibay K. and mentioning Codex Borgia is mostly fine, but the fact that these are outsider sources should not go unmentioned.
 * I appreciate the inclusion of Salvadoran Nahuatl tradition in addition to the existing Aztec tradition section but I would also personally try to split them up into a "myth" section.
 * The Nanahuatzin and Xolotl is properly cited and is a good inclusion, I also appreciate that at least one of the sources is directly available online, however, it could use some work in its wording. There is also a mention of a "Seler" but they are never properly cited.