User:Samhi60/The Book Thief/Fall2022 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Samhi60


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Samhi60/The_Book_Thief?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The Book Thief

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The Lead has been updated to reflect the new content by my peer.

The Lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.

The Lead does include a brief description of the article's major sections.

The Lead does include information that is not present in the article.

The Lead is concise.

Content:

The content added is relevant to the topic.

The content added is up-to-date.

There is not content that is missing is there is not content that does not belong.

The article does deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. It does address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance:

There was tone or balance represented on the edit page.

Sources and References:

The new content is backed up by new secondary sources of information.

The content does accurately reflect what the cited sources say.

The sources are not really that thorough, they do reflect the available literature on the topic.

The sources are not current.

The sources are written by a group of people. They do include historically marginalized individuals where possible.

The links do work.

Organization:

The content added is organized alright, The page is clear and easy to read.

The content does have a couple grammatical or spelling errors.

The added content is well-organized.

Images and Media:

The article does include images that enhance understanding of the topic.

The images are well-captioned.

The images do adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

The images are laid out in a appealing way.

Overall Impressions:

The content added has improved the article.

The strength of organizing and sources have improved on the article.

The refences on this article have been updated with more information and sources.