User:SamiB11/Academic Capitalism/Bandile Masilela Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SamiB11


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SamiB11/Academic_Capitalism?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SamiB11/Academic_Capitalism?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section of this article opens up with a great neutral tone and with the necessary information discussing the topic at hand. It doesn't outline the sections that will follow. The tone of the article then changes to that of a paper instead of an article that is meant only to present information. It feels more like a paper than an internet article so a change in the tone throughout the article is needed after the lead. The information provided is very detailed and it comes from reputable sources. The referencing in text is very well done.