User:SamiB11/Academic Capitalism/Hannah.hrm Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * I really enjoyed the way that you sectioned your findings to create a well- put together structure of literature. I am slightly confused when reviewing this article as I'm trying to decipher what information you are wanting to add to the existing main article of your topic. Is all of this new information that has a place in the existing article? I like how you wrote from a neutral tone and don't try to persuade the audience in any particular direction. One addition to your current information would be to potentially add in sources/ topics of relevance from the more current time period to inform the audience of discussions that are occurring currently in the realm of academic capitalism. You are also missing a composed list of your references for access.