User:Samjgreer/Adobe PhotoDeluxe/Helicopter331 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Samjgreer


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Samjgreer/Adobe PhotoDeluxe
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Adobe PhotoDeluxe

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead has not been updated to reflect new content added by my peer. I assume that my peer is using the original article's lead. The content added is relevant to the topic, describing the features of Adobe Photoshop Deluxe, something that was not mentioned in the original article. The content is also up to date. The content added possesses a neutral tone, containing purely factual information such as dates, features, etc. The content is backed up with reliable sources through functioning links, including the company Adobe as well as archives of Adobe's home page describing the software. The content accurately reflects what the sources say, and is correctly cited. The sources are not necessarily "up to date", however the topic is about an old software, making it unlikely that there are recent sources talking about it. In general, the writing is clear, concise, and easy to read with no grammatical errors. The page is broken into sections including its features, versions, history, and pricing.