User:Sampriti.Saxena/Child trafficking in India/Mobeenb98 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Sampriti.Saxena
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Sampriti.Saxena/Child trafficking in India

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
I believe that the lead accurately depicts the subject matter and the small edits within the paragraph do a great job to emphasize/elaborate the nature of the crime and importance.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
The content is directly related to the topic, the paragraph about education draws an importance towards the underlying cause as to how child trafficking in India has manifested into the issue it is today. Stating the absence of a strong public education system gives the audience a more vivid depiction of the scene within India, and the issue overall. All content seems to be updated and is properly cited.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone throughout all edits are neutral and don't express any kind of bias or persuasion towards the audience. I believe all view points are accurately represented.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
All sources are properly cited in the content, though is there any other source that can be cited in the education paragraph? Aside from that all the citation links work and used appropriately.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The content is well written and is clear and concise. Adding to the the first paragraph and "additional causes" helped with the overall flow, which I think is great. There are no grammatical errors and it is broken down in a systematic way that properly addresses the issue of child trafficking within the context of India.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
I do not see any images but I would love to see some in the future!

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary info boxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Overall I think you did a great job of improving this article, you made edits throughout the entire article which made it feel a lot more refreshed and properly addressed the issue. I would perhaps break up the education paragraph into two perhaps just so that it does not seem as clumped up, but overall the content is great. Adding an image would be great to see as well, and citing a bit more from you sources. Overall really good job!