User:Samson1453/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Time

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

The Wikipedia article on Time is important because it describes a very complex topic in a way that can be understood by people who might not be familiar with the nuance of the subject. I was very impressed by the clear use of language.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The Wikipedia article on Time is very well written in terms understandable by someone without experience in the subject. Time has many applications and is defined in many ways in many fields. The article explains this in the last paragraph of the introduction.

The information appears to be thorough and up to date. The topic does not appear to be historically under represented.

There are 105 sources in the reference section, and they are from a diverse group of sources.

The article's talk page is tricky to understand, as it contains all the complex topics that are then translated to basic english on the main page.

My overall impression is that the article is very good, it is complete, well researched, and well developed. I do not know enough about the subject to recomend improvements.