User:Samuel Raaflaub/Klüver–Bucy syndrome/Lydiaham Peer Review

Good additions!

Lead: The lead is a bit short, so perhaps a little bit more information on how it is caused and presents itself.

Content: Your additions of pathology, treatment, and how the disease is different in children were all useful and add to the article's depth. You may need to review the grammar and ensure that it is clear and concise. Good use of references.

Tone and Balance: Overall, your tone was academic and did not have a strong bias.

Sources and References: Your sources were recent and reputable. Continue to add new sources as you add to the article.

Organization: Be sure that your order is logical and flows.

Images: Consider adding an image, perhaps a diagram of how the brain is affected.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)