User:Sanamchalan/Talk:Chignon (medical term)/Sanamchalan Peer Review


 * 1) Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?
 * 2) * The article concisely provides information on chignon and includes other relevant medical terms. However, the subheaders / organization of the article distracts from the main topic of chignon and focuses on the other relevant topics more. The chignon vs __ sections can be combined in a table or pros / cons format and more sections can be added such as risks, complications, treatment, etc. Maybe look into Wikipedia’s template for medical terms. I found the images very helpful in visualizing the process and result of vacuum-assisted delivery.
 * 3) Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?
 * 4) * Yes, the group has achieved their goals of providing more information on what it is specifically as a subcategory of caput succedaneum, what it looks like and how it arises. But, I feel more information can be included about the last two goals of short/long term consequences and how this is treated in the US and in other countries.
 * 5) Are the claims included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available?
 * 6) * Most of the sources were relevant, verifiable and easily accessible. The sources that are not accessible were 5, 7, 9, and 13. Not sure on the relevance of source 11. 15 is a repeat source from 4.

General info
Chignon (medical term)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Chignon (medical term)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Chignon (medical term):old version: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chignon_(medical_term)&oldid=1012369343

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)