User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes2010/Guides

Guide writer's views
My (SandyGeorgia's) summary of the most helpful ArbCom election guides.

In the following chart: So this table is a guide to the guidewriter's views
 * A ✅ means the guide writer supports the candidate,
 * A means they oppose the candidate.
 * A grey dot means they stated no view, or were neutral.

Guide writer's outcomes, neutral penalized
Next, an analysis by Lar.

In the following chart/analysis:
 * A ✅ means that the guide writer supported a candidate who won, or opposed a candidate who lost
 * A means that the guide writer supported a candidate who lost, or opposed a candidate who won.
 * A is also given if the guide writer either had no opinion or was neutral

In THIS analysis, overall predictive capability is what is being measured, and hanging back is negative.

Guide writers outcomes, neutral discarded
Finally, an analysis by Ncmvocalist.

In this analysis/chart
 * A ✅ means that the guide writer supported a candidate who won, or opposed a candidate who lost
 * A means that the guide writer supported a candidate who lost, or opposed a candidate who won.

HOWEVER, in this analysis, there is no penalty for hanging back or being neutral (denoted with a gray dot), and the calculations in this case only measure accuracy when an opinion was given.